Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jasmine's avatar

I understand where you’re coming from and clearly a lot of folks resonate with this. I came across your TikTok and was eager to read this article that left a positive impact for many, but was left disappointed. I understand you don’t appreciate “label discourse”, and your ending paragraphs were pertinent, but your article in itself is a contribution to this discourse. You threw gasoline into a fire and were confused why it still continued to burn.

Overall, what you experience is called political lesbianism and you’ll find similar experiences to yours well documented. I find your summary of comments on the auto-straddle article puzzling as, many were mentioning this fact but it remained unaddressed.

I also find your note about “previous generations didn’t care about sapphic label distinction” as contradictory to Feminist/lesbian history (see: Lesbian separatist movement).

That being said, being lesbian is not just being a queer woman who engages in queer community. If one can acknowledge a heterosexual woman experiences attraction to only men, then one can acknowledge a lesbian (homosexual) woman only experiences attraction to women.

If the label doesn’t apply, then you don’t have to use it. Terms such as sapphic, queer, pan, etc. encompass the complexities of experience if you finds the labels bisexual and homosexual too restrictive. But the term lesbian is primarily about attraction not experience.

Also from a writing perspective: in an article about lesbianism, you fell into a pitfall of beginning your work with a statement about feeling attraction to boys at a young age. I found that quite disjointing. And similarly your point on decentering men felt like you were recentering them into the conversation. There wasn’t much indication you hated them, quite the contrary as you fell in love at a point in your life, so why bring it up?

I’m glad Doechii came across this, but that now positions you as a contributor to lesbian history who will inevitably shape our discourse on the label. With this new visibility I implore to exercise more caution in your writing.

Here Sunday's avatar

Lesbians do not choose to be a lesbian. It’s either you are or you aren’t. It’s simple. You don’t choose that.

Also, it seems that some bisexual or pansexual women base their identity on their encounters with men, then jump on the lesbian label because those encounters with men were negative. When reflecting on those encounters, it’s important to question whether you’d still consider yourself a lesbian if those encounters with men were positive. If more men were great lovers and better people, would you still be lesbian? If that man didn’t get you pregnant, would you still consider yourself a lesbian?

Being a lesbian isn’t a trauma response or something you can run to when encounters with men are negative.

It’s okay if you aren’t a lesbian. But, there are women who aren’t attracted to men and have no interest in being with them in any way. Everyone doesn’t need to be grouped together. It’s okay to be a sapphic bisexual or pansexual if you are attracted to men.

It’s posts like these that create doubt when a lesbian claims her identity, with some doubters even placing bets on when (not if, when) she’d end up with a man. Claiming to be a lesbian shouldn’t be taken lightly due to how much harm it causes for the lesbian community when someone says “oh, I’m no longer a lesbian” after two years. (The harm for the community: thinking lesbians are lying, can be “turned straight”, haven’t found the “right man,” etc.) Those “it’s just a phase” comments are prevalent for a reason, and one reason is because of posts like this one.

147 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?